mirabelclarissar, hell yeah!

mirabelclarissar

psychology2010: Interested in Knowing “How” a Person is Thinking about Something?  This could be done through understanding what is known as visual access cues. Visual access cues are clues about how a person is thinking about something by measuring the directions in his or her eye movements. For instance, can you recall a time when you ask someone “How his or her graduation ceremony was like?” and as he or she tells you that “It was wonderful, that he or she was to give a short public speech, and parents were there, that the place was well decorated” that you see his or her eyes move to the top right. What the directions of the eyes signal is that the person is visually recalling events. So this means, the person is tracing back in memories to how the events have happened. However, should the eyes move to the left top side, this may suggest that the person is making up or creating the events. Hence, learning how to read visual cues can be clues to whether a person is telling the truth or not. In fact, almost all professionals who work as actors, psychologists, politicians, or federal agencies are trained in this.  However, there are individual differences in how people respond. Some people might be oppositely orientated. That is for most while the eyes move to the top right to signal image recall, for some it could be the opposite direction, top left. Hence, it is important that we take this individual variability into account. To know whether a person is oppositely or normally orientated, we have to calibrate. This is we have to find out. This could be done by asking several questions we know the answers to. For example, if we know the person saw a red car that was in a crash scene and you ask the person to think about what the car looks like, and as he or she tells you that the car is red on the outside and moves the eyes to the top right, then you know that he or she possess a normal eye orientation. However, should the opposite occur, then he or she is oppositely orientated.  However, we have to ask several questions to make sure. Eye accessing cues is not 100% accurate nor 100% valid. Hence, we have to calibrate, get an idea first before we come to conclusions.  Eye accessing cues provides an interesting way of reading how people think and can sometimes provide clues to what people are actually thinking. Never the less, eye accessing cues is not 100% accurate nor 100% valid and not everyone has the same eye patterns and thus we must calibrate before drawing any conclusions.                                 © 2011 by Psychology2010.tumblr.com 

psychology2010:

Interested in Knowing “How” a Person is Thinking about Something? 

This could be done through understanding what is known as visual access cues. Visual access cues are clues about how a person is thinking about something by measuring the directions in his or her eye movements. For instance, can you recall a time when you ask someone “How his or her graduation ceremony was like?” and as he or she tells you that “It was wonderful, that he or she was to give a short public speech, and parents were there, that the place was well decorated” that you see his or her eyes move to the top right. What the directions of the eyes signal is that the person is visually recalling events. So this means, the person is tracing back in memories to how the events have happened. However, should the eyes move to the left top side, this may suggest that the person is making up or creating the events.

Hence, learning how to read visual cues can be clues to whether a person is telling the truth or not. In fact, almost all professionals who work as actors, psychologists, politicians, or federal agencies are trained in this. 

However, there are individual differences in how people respond. Some people might be oppositely orientated. That is for most while the eyes move to the top right to signal image recall, for some it could be the opposite direction, top left. Hence, it is important that we take this individual variability into account.

To know whether a person is oppositely or normally orientated, we have to calibrate. This is we have to find out. This could be done by asking several questions we know the answers to. For example, if we know the person saw a red car that was in a crash scene and you ask the person to think about what the car looks like, and as he or she tells you that the car is red on the outside and moves the eyes to the top right, then you know that he or she possess a normal eye orientation. However, should the opposite occur, then he or she is oppositely orientated. 

However, we have to ask several questions to make sure. Eye accessing cues is not 100% accurate nor 100% valid. Hence, we have to calibrate, get an idea first before we come to conclusions. 

Eye accessing cues provides an interesting way of reading how people think and can sometimes provide clues to what people are actually thinking. Never the less, eye accessing cues is not 100% accurate nor 100% valid and not everyone has the same eye patterns and thus we must calibrate before drawing any conclusions. 

                               © 2011 by Psychology2010.tumblr.com 

(via psych-facts)

5 months ago

  1. sirava reblogged this from psychology2010
  2. leilz422 reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
  3. t0mxty reblogged this from nory-chan
  4. nory-chan reblogged this from psych-facts
  5. dualcolt reblogged this from here-lies-andy
  6. bi-sectedbiscuit reblogged this from psych-facts
  7. blch reblogged this from billielorraine
  8. xjustastarintheskyx reblogged this from psych-facts
  9. itslyssabxtch reblogged this from im-not-perfectt
  10. clearly-complicated reblogged this from im-not-perfectt
  11. im-not-perfectt reblogged this from thousandwordsmile
  12. midnightrazor246 reblogged this from psych-facts
  13. sabrina1211 reblogged this from psych-facts
  14. ordnance reblogged this from psych-facts
  15. narinarihanari reblogged this from thousandwordsmile
  16. thousandwordsmile reblogged this from ribbonsandkeys
  17. ribbonsandkeys reblogged this from camdroid
  18. alien-jjong reblogged this from psych-facts
  19. whateverthehelliplease reblogged this from cabrea
  20. gingervengenz reblogged this from psychology2010
  21. tatermess reblogged this from psych-facts
  22. asdfghjklandlove reblogged this from psych-facts
  23. lifes-too-serious reblogged this from psych-facts
  24. desolatetheexoplanet reblogged this from psych-facts
  25. dat-asian reblogged this from psych-facts
  26. theaarts reblogged this from psych-facts

1 ⁄ 1

- Inkhorn theme powered by Tumblr -